Ruthenium or Osmium Complexes and Their Uses as Catalysts for Water Oxidation

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides ruthenium or osmium complexes and their uses as a catalyst for catalytic water oxidation. Another aspect of the invention provides an electrode and photo-electrochemical cells for electrolysis of water molecules.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/236,219, filed Aug. 24, 2009, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made, in-part, with United States government support under grant number DE-FG02-06ER15788 from the Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has certain rights to this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to catalysts for water oxidation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Hydrogen is one of the most promising alternative energy sources. It can be obtained by electrolysis of water, which is environmentally friendly and efficient. However, the electrolysis of water is an energy intensive process, which is very expensive. On the other hand, photolysis, the splitting of water by light, presents an attractive alternative method of obtaining hydrogen. Additionally, light driven reduction of carbon dioxide by water to provide hydrocarbons or methanol may be another promising alternative to alternate energy sources. For both types of reactions, coupled water oxidation to oxygen is required. In order to facilitate the photolysis of water by light in either type of reaction, a catalyst is required for the reaction. However, there are very few catalysts found to be efficient and cost effective to carry out this reaction. (See, Molecular, Catalysts for Water Oxidation, Yagi et al, Chem. Rev., 101, 21-35 (2001)). For example, Gratzel et al., described that Ruthenium dimers can be used as catalysts for water oxidation. (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,634 to Gratzel et al.). More recently, Brimblecombe et al. have discovered that tetra-manganese-oxo cluster can also be used to catalyze water oxidation. (See PCT application WO 2008/116254 to Brimblecombe et al.). However, these catalysts are limited to the scope and ability to harness the photo chemical reactions.

Therefore, there is a need in the industry for an efficient catalyst for the electrolysis or photoelectrolysis of water to obtain hydrogen or water reduction of carbon dioxide to obtain affordable and sustainable alternative source of energy.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Some aspects of the present invention provide complexes comprising formula (I):

wherein M is ruthenium (Ru) or osmium (Os), L₁ is a bidentate ligand, L₂ is a tridentate ligand, L₃ is a monodentate ligand, and n is 2 or 1.

In one embodiment, L₁ is a bidentate ligand selected from

In another embodiment, L₂ is a tridentate ligand selected from

In one embodiment, L₃ is OH₂.

In some embodiment, the complex has a structure selected from the group consisting of [Ru (tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru (tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mcbim-pz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(P₂-bpy)]²⁺, [Ru (Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺, Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-CH₂PO₃H₂bpy)-(OH₂)²⁺, {Ru(Mebimpy)[4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy](OH₂)}²⁺ and OS(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)²⁺.

According to another aspect of the invention, the complexes described above may be used as a catalyst for catalytic water oxidation.

A further aspect of the invention provides an electrode comprising a complex descried herein.

Another aspect of the present invention provides photo-electrochemical cells comprising a catalyst described herein.

Another aspect of the invention provides photoelectrolytic devices comprising a catalyst described herein and a supporting substrate on which said catalyst is supported.

A further aspect of the invention describes methods of generating hydrogen (H₂) and/or oxygen (O₂) gases. The method comprises providing a catalyst described herein and adding the catalyst to an electrolytic media under a condition effective to generate hydrogen and/or oxygen.

Another aspect of the invention describes methods of generating methanol, hydrocarbons and/or oxygen (O₂). The method comprises: providing a catalyst described herein and adding the catalyst to an electrolytic media under a condition effective to generate methanol, hydrocarbons and/or oxygen (O₂).

Objects of the present invention will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the Figures and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments which follow, such description being merely illustrative of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.

FIG. 1 demonstrates plots of E_(1/2) (V vs NHE) vs pH for the Ru (V/IV) and Ru(IV/II) redox couples of [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺ and for the Ru(IV/III) and Ru(III/II) redox couples of [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ in aqueous solution (I=0.1 M; T=298 K; glassy carbon working electrode).

FIG. 2 demonstrates plots of current versus voltage in solution of Ag/AgCl for background and o.5 mM [Ru(tpy)(bmp)(OH₂)]²⁺.

FIG. 3 graphically demonstrates plots of the amount of evolved (O₂) versus time and turnover number for Ru(tpy)(bmp)(OH₂)]²⁺.

FIG. 4 demonstrates proposed mechanism for water oxidation by single-site catalysts [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺ and [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺ in 0.1 M HNO₃.

FIG. 5 shows the X-ray structure of the trans-[Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺ cation in the salt trans-[Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)](ClO₄)₂.

FIG. 6 (a) demonstrates the representative cyclic voltammograms for monomeric catalysts when the conditions are 1.0 mM complex in 0.1 M HNO₃; glassy carbon working electrode; and scan rate: 10 mV/s. FIG. 6( b) shows cyclic voltammograms for [Ru(tpy)(acac)(OH₂)]⁺ when the conditions are 1.0 mM complex in 0.1 M HNO₃ and glassy carbon working electrode.

FIG. 7( a) shows UV-vis spectra of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ after various soaking times in 0.1 mM solution in methanol. FIG. 7( b) shows the dependence of the absorbance at 493 nm on the soaking time.

FIG. 8 demonstrates cyclic voltammogram of 1 mM of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ 1 at pH 5 at GC electrode (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; scan rate, 100 mV/s). The dotted line is the solution blank under the same experimental conditions.

FIG. 9 (a) demonstrates cyclic voltammogram of a mixture of 1 mM of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ 1 and 1 mM Fe(CN)₆ ⁴⁻ in solution at pH 2 comparing peak currents for the one-electron waves for the corresponding Ru(III/II) and Fe(CN)₆ ^(3−/4−) couples. FIG. 9 (b) demonstrates cyclic voltammogram of 1 mM of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺1 at pH 14 showing the one-electron waves for the Ru(IV/III) and Ru(III/II) couples. I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; GC working electrode; scan rate, 100 mV/s.

FIG. 10 (a) demonstrates cyclic voltammogram of ITO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; scan rate, 100 mV/s). The dotted line is the ITO background under the same experimental conditions. FIG. 10 (b) Cyclic voltammograms of ITO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 before (solid line) and after (dotted line) scanning to 1.85 V.

FIG. 11 demonstrates plots of E_(1/2) vs pH for the Ru(III/II), Ru(IV/III), and Ru(V/IV) solution redox couples of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺1 (I=0.1 M; GC working electrode; scan rate, 100 mV/s).

FIG. 12 demonstrates plots of E_(1/2) vs pH for the Ru(III/II), Ru(IV/III), and Ru(V/IV) surface-bound couples at FTO|1-PO₃H₂ (or ITO|1-PO₃H₂) and for the peroxidic Ru^(IV)(OO)²⁺/Re^(III)-OOH²⁺ and Ru^(III)-OOH²⁺/Ru^(II)(HOOH)²⁺ redox couples following an oxidative scan to 1.85 V vs NHE (I=0.1 M; scan rate, 100 mV/s).

FIG. 13 (a) demonstrates cyclic voltammograms for ITO|1-PO₃H₂ electrodes with various complex loadings at pH 5 (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; scan rate, 100 mV/s). Inset shows a magnified view of anodic and cathodic waves for the Ru(III/II) surface couple. FIG. 13 (b) shows the dependence of the electrocatalytic current at 1.85 V vs NHE on surface complex loading (ITO background subtracted).

FIG. 14 (a) demonstrates selective cyclic voltammograms of FTO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 at different scan rates (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na). The currents are normalized for scan rate, i/v. FIG. 14 (b) demonstrates dependence of peak current on scan rate for the Ru(III/II) surface wave at E_(1/2)˜0.67 V vs NHE.

FIG. 15 (a) shows the cyclic voltammogram of FTO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; scan rate, 100 mV/s). The dotted line is the FTO background under the same experimental conditions. The inset shows cyclic voltammograms of FTO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 before (blue line) and after (red line) scanning to 1.85 V. FIG. 15 (b) shows the electrolysis of FTO|1-PO₃H₂ at 1.85 V vs NHE at pH 5. Number of turnovers ˜11,000, turnover frequency ˜0.36 s⁻¹ (background subtracted). Γ=1.2×10⁻¹⁰ mol/cm², area=1.25 cm², current density ˜14.8 μA/cm².

FIG. 16 (a) shows the cyclic voltammogram of ITO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 1 (0.1 M HNO₃; scan rate, 100 mV/s). The dotted line is the ITO background under the same experimental conditions. FIG. 16 (b) shows the electrolysis of ITO|1-PO₃H₂ at 1.85 V vs NHE at pH 1 (0.1 M HNO₃). Number of turnovers ˜3600, turnover frequency ˜0.12 s⁻¹ (background subtracted). Γ=1.2×10⁻¹⁰ mol/cm², area=1.25 cm², current density ˜4.9 μA/cm².

FIG. 17 demonstrates cyclic voltammogram of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na; scan rate, 10 mV/s). The dotted line is the FTO|TiO₂ background under the same experimental conditions.

FIG. 18 (a) illustrates cyclic voltammograms of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ at pH 5 at different scan rates (I=0.1 M, CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na). FIG. 18 (b) shows dependence of the peak current for the Ru(III/II) wave on the square root of the scan rate.

FIG. 19 demonstrates UV-Vis spectra of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ (black line), following complete electrolysis at: 0.75 V (red line, actual spectrum×4.5), 1.20 V (green line) and 1.85 V (blue line) vs NHE at pH 5. The spectrum in red was obtained with Γ=0.26×10⁻¹⁰ mol/cm², and the others with Γ=1.2×10⁻¹° mol/cm². The inset shows a magnified view of the low energy visible.

FIG. 20 illustrates schematic representation of 1-PO₃H₂ attached to a metal oxide electrode.

FIG. 21 illustrates a proposed photoelectrochemical cell (PEC) for water splitting. C is a chromophore, D an electron transfer donor, A an electron transfer acceptor and Cat_(ox) and Cat_(Red) are catalysts for water oxidation and reduction.

FIG. 22 describes the variations in catalytic current density. The upper graph shows the variations in catalytic current density. (i_(cat) in mA/cm²; background subtracted) for 1 mM [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ at a GC electrode at room temperature with added bases: H₂PO₄ ⁻ at pH 2.4 (▪), OAc⁻ at pH 5 (), and HPO₄ ²⁻ at pH 7.45 (▴). The Lower graph shows the plots of vs. [B]. Ionic strength (I=0.1 M) was maintained with added KNO₃; scan rate, 100 mV/s.

FIG. 23 shows the variations in i_(cat) (background subtracted) at ITO|1-PO₃H₂ with added bases, H₂PO₄ ⁻ at pH 2.4 (▪), OAc⁻ at pH 5 (), and HPO₄ ²⁻ at pH 7.45 (▴). Ionic strength (I=0.1 M) was maintained with added KNO₃.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The foregoing and other aspects of the present invention will now be described in more detail with respect to the description and methodologies provided herein. It should be appreciated that the invention can be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.

The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the description of the embodiments of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Also, as used herein, “and/or” refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. Furthermore, the term “about,” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as an amount of a compound, dose, time, temperature, and the like, is meant to encompass variations of 20%, 10%, 5%, 1%, 0.5%, or even 0.1% of the specified amount. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Unless otherwise defined, all terms, including technical and scientific terms used in the description, have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.

All patents, patent applications and publications referred to herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of a conflict in terminology, the present specification is controlling.

A. Complexes

Provided herein according to some embodiments of the invention are complexes, which comprise the structure of formula (I):

wherein M is ruthenium (Ru) or osmium (Os), and L₁, L₂ and L₃ may be any combinations of any ligands as long as the combination meets the bonding requirement for M. n+ represents the positive charge for the complex of formula I. The value of n depends on the specific combination of M and ligands of L₁, L₂ and L₃. In some embodiments, n is 2 or 1. Any applicable anions may be used to bond with the complex of formula I. the In some embodiments, L₁ may be any applicable bidentate ligand that is known to one skilled in the art, L₂ may be any applicable tridentate ligand that is known to one skilled in the art and L₃ may be any applicable monodentate ligand that is known to one skilled in the art. In one embodiment, L₃ is OH₂. According to the investigators of the present application, the considerations of selecting the ligands include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) the stability toward oxidation by the high oxidation state oxo forms of the catalysts; (2) the ability electronically to provide the metal (e.g. Ru or Os) to access higher oxidation state IV and V oxidation states by oxo formation; and (3) the resulting potential for multi-electron oxidation of water being sufficient to be thermodynamically allowed.

As used herein, a ligand is either an atom, ion, or molecule that binds to a central metal to produce a coordination complex. The bonding between the metal and ligand generally involves formal donation of one or more of the ligand's electrons. The monodentate ligand is a ligand with one lone pair of electrons that is capable of binding to an atom (e.g. a metal atom). Exemplary monodentate ligands include, but are not limited to, OH₂ (aqua), NH₃ (ammine), CH₃NH₂ (methylamine), CO (carbonyl), NO (nitrosyl), F⁻ (fluoro), CN⁻ (cyano), Cl⁻ (chloro), Br⁻ (bromo), I⁻ (iodo), NO₂ ⁻ (nitro), and OH⁻ (hydroxyl). In some embodiments, the monodentate ligand is H₂O. The bidentate ligand is a ligand with two lone pairs of electron that are capable of binding to an atom (e.g. a metal atom). Exemplary bidentate ligands include, but are not limited to, bipyridine, phenanthroline, 2-phenylpyridine bipyrimidine, bipyrazyl, glycinate, acetylacetonate, 2,6-bis(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (mebim-py) and ethylenediamine. The tridentate ligand and terdentate ligand is a ligand with respectively three or four lone pairs of electron that are capable of binding to an atom (e.g. a metal atom). Exemplary tridentate ligands include, but are not limited to, terpyridine, DMAP, and Mebimpy.

The terminology of monodentate ligand, bidentate ligand, and tridentate ligand are well known to those skilled in the art. Further exemplary monodentate ligand, bidentate ligand, and tridentate ligand are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,488,817, 7,368,597, 7,291,575, 7,232,616, 6,946,420, 6,900,153, 6,734,131, 4,481,184, 4,019,857, and 4,452,774, which are incorporated by references in their entirety.

The bidentate ligands and tridentate ligands used in the present invention may be optionally substituted with one or more substituents. Any applicable substituents may be used. Exemplary substituents include, but are not limited to, carboxylic acid, ester, amide, halogen, anhydride, acyl ketone, alkyl ketone, acid chloride, sulfonic acid, phosphonic acid, nitro and nitroso groups. The substituents may be located at any acceptable location on the ligand and may include any number of substituents which may be substituted on the particular ligand.

More exemplary L₁ include, but are not limited to,

The complex provided according to some embodiments of the invention is selected from:

In one embodiment, the complex is a structure selected from the group consisting of [Ru (tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru (tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(P₂-bpy)]²⁺, [Ru (Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺, Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-CH₂PO₃H₂bpy)-(OH₂)²⁺, {Ru(Mebimpy)[4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy](OH₂)}²⁺ and Os(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)²⁺.

B. Synthesis

Compounds described herein may be prepared by using methods described in the literature with modifications known to one skilled in the art.

For example, [Ru(tpy)(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+) complexes with LL=bpy, bpm, bpz and acac may be prepared according to methods known to one skilled in the art. (See Concepcion, et al., J Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130(49), 16462-16463, Dovletoglou, et al., Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35(14), 4120-4127, Takeuchi, et al., Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23(13), 1845-1851, and Takeuchi, et al., Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23(13), 1845-1851.)

The synthesis of the [Ru(Mebimpy)(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+) complexes with LL=bpy, bpm, bpz and acac may be accomplished following procedures similar to those used for the corresponding tpy complexes discussed above. They may involve isolation of the [Ru(Mebimpy)(NN)(Cl)]^(n+) complexes followed by replacement of the chloro ligand in water assisted by added silver triflate or triflic acid. The trans-[Ru(tpy)(NC)(OH₂)]²⁺, trans-[Ru(Mebimpy)(NC)(OH₂)]²⁺ complexes and trans-[Ru(DMAP)(NC)(OH₂)]²⁺ (NC is 3-methyl-1-pyridylimidazol-2-ylidene, MeIm-py; 3-methyl-1-pyridylbenzimidazol-2-ylidene, Mebim-py; and 3-methyl-1-pyrazylbenzimidazol-2-ylidene, Mebim-pz) may be obtained by reaction of the monocalionic carbene precursors with Ru(tpy)Cl₃, Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ or Ru(DMAP)Cl₃ in ethyleneglycol at 150° C. in the presence of NEt₃. (See Sullivan et al., Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19(5), 1404-1407, Welch, et al., Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36(21), 4812-4821.) In these cases the aquo complexes are isolated rather than chloro complexes most likely due to a trans-labilizing effect of the carbene on chloride ligand loss, since only the trans isomer is obtained, see below. For example, [Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-((OH)₂OPCH₂)²⁻bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ may be prepared by a modification of the procedure used to synthesize [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ with an extra step required to hydrolyze the phosphonate esther groups. Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)²⁺ may be prepared following a literature procedure. All complexes may be characterized by ¹H-NMR, elemental analysis, absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. More exemplary syntheses of some compounds described herein are discussed in Examples sections.

C. Catalyst, Electrode, and Cell for Electrocatalytic Reaction

According to some embodiments, the compounds described herein may be used as a catalyst. In some embodiments, the catalyst described herein may be used for electrocatalytic reaction (e.g. electrocatalytic water oxidation).

As a non-limiting example, the proposed mechanism of the electrolysis of water catalyzed by some exemplary compound of the present invention is proposed in FIG. 4. The compounds disclosed herein can be used as a catalyst for electrochemical, chemical and/or photochemical water oxidation.

According to some observations of the investigators, for most single site Ru complexes, it appears to be a common mechanism utilizing PCET oxidation to Ru^(IV)═O^(n+) followed by further oxidation and water attack on Ru^(V)═O^((n+)+) to give Ru^(III)-OOH^(n+). The O—O bond forming reaction is reminiscent of well documented O-atom transfer to sulfides, sulfoxides, phosphines, and olefins by Ru(bpy)₂(py)(O)²⁺ and Ru(tpy)(bpy)(O)²⁺. (See Meyer, et al., Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42(25), 8140-8160.) Furthermore, it appears that water oxidation catalysis appears to be general for polypyridyl aqua complexes with coordinated H₂O which have oxidatively stable ligands, the ability to reach higher oxidation state Ru═O intermediates, and the driving force to carry out water oxidation.

In addition, the investigators of the present invention have observed that the compounds described herein are effective for catalytic (e.g. Ce (IV)) water oxidation undergoing hundreds of turnovers without decomposition of the catalyst.

Furthermore, it is also observed that the ligand electronic effects on reactivity may affect the rates and overvoltage's for catalytic water oxidation. (See Example 5 and FIG. 6)

Another aspect of the present invention provides an electrode. In some embodiments, the electrode may be used for the electrolysis of water molecules comprising a catalyst comprising a compound described herein on the electrode substrate. As used herein, “electrode” is an electrical conductor used to make contact with a nonmetallic part of a circuit (e.g. a semiconductor, an electrolyte or a vacuum).

In some embodiments, the electrode may be an anode. For example, the catalysts described herein are added to the surfaces of anodes where oxidation occurs by application of an electrical potential or on photoanodes where the required potential is created by light absorption and electron transfer. In some embodiments, the electrode further comprises a supporting substrate. Any applicable supporting substrate may be used in the present invention. In some embodiments, the supporting substrate comprising fluorine-doped SnO₂ (FTO) or Sn(IV)-doped In₂O₃ (ITO). It is observed by the investigators of the present application that the surface bound complex of the catalyst comprising compounds described herein retains its chemical (E_(1/2) values, pH dependence) and physical properties (UV-visible spectra) including its ability to catalyze water oxidation. In some embodiments, electrocatalysis reaction catalyzed by catalyst described herein may occur on TiO₂ which has been used in dye-sensitized solar cells.

The electrode may be prepared according to any applicable methods known to one skilled in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,797,182 to Beer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,402,996 to Gauger et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,320,842 to Ozaki et al., and U.S. 20090169974 to Tabata, which are incorporated by references in their entireties.

A further aspect of the present invention provides a photo-electrochemical cell comprising a complex described herein. In some embodiments, the photo-electrochemical cell is referred to as solar cells which generate electrical energy from light, including visible light. In some embodiments, the visible light is used for chemical conversion reactions at a separate electrode. In one aspect, the cell may be used for electrolysis of water oxidation. In one embodiment, the cell further comprises a base. In one embodiment, the bases include at least one proton acceptor base. As used herein, a proton acceptor base is any substance that is capable of accepting a proton. Exemplary proton acceptor base includes, but are not limited to, H₂PO₄ ⁻ acetate (OAc⁻), and HPO₄ ²⁻. The investigators of the present application have observed that the addition of bases such as proton acceptor bases may enhance the rate of the electro catalytic water oxidation. It is believed that the addition of the bases accelerates the O—O bond formation of Ru^(III−)OOH²⁺ by concerted atom-proton transfer (APT) with the added base acting as a proton acceptor decreasing the barrier in the key O—O bond forming step. The photo-electrochemical cell may be prepared according to any applicable methods known to one skilled in the art, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,388,384 to Rauh et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,793,910 to Smotkin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,440 to Kay et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,765 to Wariishi et al., which are incorporated by references in their entireties.

A further aspect of the present invention provides a photoelectrolytic device comprising a catalyst, wherein the catalyst comprises a complex described herein, and a supporting substrate on which said catalyst is supported. In one embodiment, the device further comprises a base. In one embodiment, the bases include at least one proton acceptor base described above. The device may be prepared according to any applicable methods known to one skilled in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,756,807 to Meyer, US 2007/0137998 to Sykora et al., and U.S. 20090169974 to Tabata, which are incorporated by references in their entireties.

A further aspect of the present invention provides methods of generating hydrogen (H₂) and/or oxygen (O₂) gases. In one embodiment, the method comprises providing a catalyst described herein, and adding the catalyst to an electrolytic media under a condition effective to generate hydrogen and/or oxygen. In one embodiment, the methods further comprise exposing the reaction media, which contains the catalyst to light radiation to generate hydrogen and/or oxygen gases.

In another embodiment, the method comprises exposing the photo-electrochemical cell described herein to light radiation to generate hydrogen and oxygen gases without the requirement of applying an external electrical potential. In one embodiment, the method further comprises adding at least one proton acceptor base described above.

Another aspect of the present invention provides methods of generating hydrocarbons, methanol and/or oxygen (O₂) gases by photo-electrolyzing water. The method comprises providing a catalyst described herein and adding the catalyst to a electrolytic media under an effective condition to generate methanol/hydrocarbons and/or oxygen (O₂). In one embodiment, the method further comprises exposing the reaction media which contain the catalyst to light radiation to generate methanol, hydrocarbons and/or oxygen (O₂). In another embodiment, the method comprises exposing the photo-electrochemical cell described herein to light radiation without the requirement of applying an external electrical potential. In one embodiment, the method further comprises adding at least one proton acceptor base described above.

The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the following examples. However, these examples are given for the purpose of illustration and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES Materials and Methods

Distilled water was further purified using a Milli-Q Ultrapure water purification system. Stock solutions of Ce^(IV) for kinetic and stoichiometric measurements were prepared from (NH₄)₂Ce(NO₃)₆ (99.99+%, Aldrich). Nitric acid (Trace Metal Grade, 70%) was purchased from Fisher Scientific and perchloric acid (70%, purified by redistillation, 99.999% trace metals basis) was purchased from Aldrich. 2,2′-bipyrimidine (97%) and RuCl₃×3H₂O were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. 2,2′-bipyrazine¹ and [Ru(tpy)Cl₃]² were prepared as described in the literature. [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)](PF₆)₂ and [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)](PF₆)₂ (bpm is 2,2′-bipyrimidine and bpz is 2,2′-bipyrazine) were prepared according to methods described in Concepcion, J. J.; Jurss, J. W.; Templeton, J. L.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130(49), 16462-16463. All other reagents were ACS grade and used without additional purification. 2,6-Bis(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (Mebimpy) was prepared as reported for 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine. See Xu, X.; Xi, Z.; Chen, W.; Wang, D. J. Coord. Chem. 2007, 60, 2297-2308. [Ru(Mebimpy)(N—N)(Cl)](Cl) (N—N) bpy or bpm) was prepared by a modification of the procedure reported for [Ru-(tpy)(bpm)(Cl)](PF6). See Swavey, S.; Fang, Z.; Brewer, K. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2598-2607.

Elemental analyses were conducted by Atlantic Microlab, Inc., Atlanta, Ga. UV/Vis spectra and UV/Vis spectra vs time were recorded on an Agilent Technologies Model 8453 diode-array spectrophotometer. Kinetic measurements were also performed on a Shimadzu UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer Model UV-3600 by monitoring the disappearance of Ce^(IV) at 360 nm Electrochemical measurements were performed on an EG&G Princeton Applied Research model 273A potentiostat/galvanostat. Voltammetric measurements were made with a planar EG&G PARC G0229 glassy carbon millielectrode, a platinum wire EG&G PARC K0266 counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl EG&G PARC K0265 reference electrode.

Oxygen Evolution Experiments.

Oxygen measurements were performed with a calibrated O₂ electrode (YSI, Inc., Model 550A) or with a fluorescence-based YSI ProODO O₂ calibrated electrode. In a typical experiment, 30 equivalents of Ce^(IV) were added to stirred solutions containing 1.0-2.9×10⁻³ M ruthenium complex in 1.0 or 0.1 M HNO₃. The air-tight reaction cell was purged with argon prior to the addition of the Ce^(IV) until the digital readout had stabilized. O₂ evolution vs time was recorded and the theoretical maximum was achieved ±3%.

Synthesis and Characterization Ligands 2,6-bis(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (Mebimpy)

This ligand was prepared by a modification of the procedure reported for 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine.⁴ A mixture of pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (3.35 g, 20 mmol) and N-methyl-1,2-phenylenediamine (5.38 g, 44 mmol) in 40 mL of 85% phosphoric acid was stirred at ca 230° C. for 4 h. The dark green melt was poured into 1 L of vigorously stirred cold water. After it was cooled to room temperature, the blue precipitate was collected by filtration, then slurried into 300 mL of hot aqueous sodium carbonate solution (10%). The resulting solid was filtered off and recrystallized from methanol to give a white solid. Yield: 5.77 g, 85%. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 8.42 (d, 2H), 8.05 (t, 1H), 7.86-7.89 (m, 2H), 7.44-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.33-7.41 (m, 4H), 4.25 (s, 6H, 2CH₃). This ligand was pure by ¹H-NMR and was used without further purification.

2,6-bis(dimethylaminomethyl)pyridine (DMAP)

This ligand was prepared according to a methods described in Hull, J. F.; Balcells, D.; Blakemore, J. D.; Incarvito, C. D.; Eisenstein, O.; Brudvig, G. W.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131(25), 8730-8731.

N-Methyl-N′-2-pyridylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (MeIm-py⁺PF6⁻)

This ligand was synthesized by a modification of a literature procedure.⁶ A mixture of 2-bromopyridine (3.16 g, 20.0 mmol) and 1-methylimidazole (1.64 g, 20.0 mmol) was kept neat at 160° C. for 48 h. After cooling to ca 50° C., acetone was added and the resulting solid was filtered and washed with acetone and ether. The solid was dissolved in water, filtered and added to aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate. Upon standing for 2 hours the solid was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. Yield: 4.27 g (70%). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN): δ 9.25 (s, 1H, NCHN), 8.59 (d, 1H), 8.08-8.12 (dt, 1H), 8.06 (t, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H), 7.56-7.59 (dd, 1H), 7.54 (t, 1H), 3.96 (s, 3H, CH₃). This ligand was pure based on ¹H-NMR and was used without further purification.

N-Methyl-N′-2-pyridylbenzimidazolium iodide (Mebim-py⁺I⁻)

A mixture of 2-iodopyridine (2.0 g, 9.8 mmol) and 1-methylbenzimidazole (1.29 g, 9.8 mmol) was kept neat at 140° C. for 72 h. After cooling to ca 50° C., acetone was added and the resulting solid was filtered and washed with acetone and ether. Yield: 826 mg (25%). ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 10.48 (s, 1H, NCHN), 8.79 (d, 1H), 8.47-8.49 (m, 1H), 8.27-8.32 (dt, 1H), 8.14-8.16 (m, 1H), 8.04 (d, 1H), 7.77-7.82 (m, 2H), 7.71-7.74 (dd, 1H), 4.20 (s, 3H, CH₃). This ligand was pure by ¹H-NMR and was used without further purification.

N-Methyl-N′-2-pyrazylbenzimidazolium iodide (Mebim-pz⁺I⁻)

A mixture of 2-iodopyrazine (2.0 g, 9.7 mmol) and 1-methylbenzimidazole (1.28 g, 9.7 mmol) was kept neat at 135° C. for 72 h. After cooling to ca 50° C., acetone was added and the resulting solid was filtered and washed with acetone and ether. Yield: 1.1 g (34%). ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 10.59 (s, 1H, NCHN), 9.36 (s, 1H, pz), 8.97 (d, 1H), 8.88-8.90 (m, 1H), 8.47-8.49 (m, 1H), 8.17-8.19 (m, 1H), 7.79-7.85 (m, 2H), 4.23 (s, 3H, CH₃). This ligand was pure by ¹H-NMR and was used without further purification.

4,4′-Bis(diethylmethylphosphonate)-2,2′-bipyridine (4,4′-(H₂O₃PCH₂)₂-bpy)

This ligand was prepared by the procedure described in Welch et al., Inorg. Chem, 1997, 36(21), 4812-4821.

Complexes Ru(tpy)Cl₃

This complex was synthesized according to methods described in Huynh, M. H. V.; Meyer, T. J., Chem. Rev., 2007, 107(11), 5004-5064.

Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃

This complex was synthesized as reported for Ru(tpy)Cl₃ ² using Mebimpy instead of tpy. In a typical experiment RuCl₃×3H₂O (1.00 g, 3.83 mmol) and Mebimpy (1.30 g, 3.83 mmol) were mixed in 400 mL of ethanol and the mixture refluxed for 3 hours. Upon cooling to room temperature, the brown solid was filtered, washed with ethanol until the ethanol came out clear and finally with ether. Yield: 1.6 g, 76%. This compound was used without further purification.

Ru(DMAP)Cl₃

This complex was synthesized by a modification of a literature procedure.⁵ RuCl₃×3H₂O (2.0 g, 7.66 mmol) and DMAP (1.48 g, 7.66 mmol) were refluxed in ethanol (50 mL) for 3 hours. Upon cooling the green solid was filtered and washed with ethanol and ether. This solid was refluxed in 30 mL of concentrated HCl for ˜30 min to yield the product as an orange powder that was collected by filtration and washed with water and ether. This compound was used without further purification.

((Mebimpy)(Cl)Ru)₂Cl₂

Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ (500 mg,) was suspended in ethanol (40 mL) and the mixture degassed by bubbling argon trough it. Triethylamine (1.5 mL) was added and the mixture refluxed for 2 hours and filtered hot. The purple solid obtained was washed with ethanol and ether to remove [Ru(Mebimpy)₂]Cl₂, which is soluble in ethanol. This impurity is the result of reduction of [Ru(Mebimpy)₂]Cl₃ that forms as a byproduct in the synthesis of Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃. [((Mebimpy)(Cl)Ru)₂Cl₂] was used without further purification.

Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)(ClO₄)₂

This complex was prepared according to methods described in Takeuchi, K. J.; Thompson, M. S.; Pipes, D. W.; Meyer, T. J., Inorg., Chem. 1984, 23(13), 1845-1851.

Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)(ClO₄)₂.2H₂O

Ru(tpy)Cl₃ (500 mg, 1.13 mmol) and Mebim-py⁺I⁻ (382 mg, 1.13 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Tricthylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 3 hours. The crude product was isolated by addition of aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate and washed with water and ether. The brown solid obtained was dissolved in acetone and aqueous potassium nitrate was added. The solvents were removed by rotary evaporation and a small amount of 0.1 M HNO₃ was added. The mixture was filtered to remove undissolved materials and the filtrate was loaded on a column (Sephadex LH-20) and eluted with 0.1 M HNO₃. The yellow-orange band was collected and added to saturated aqueous sodium perchlorate. Upon standing in the refrigerator overnight crystals of Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)(ClO₄)₂.2H₂O formed. The product was isolated by filtration, washed with ice-cold water and air-dried. Yield: 315 mg, 35%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₂₈H₂₈Cl₂N₆O₁₁Ru: C, 42.25 (42.22); N, 10.68 (10.55); H, 3.45 (3.54). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.44 (d, 1H), 8.52 (d, 3H), 8.40 (d, 2H), 8.35-8.39 (dt, 1H), 8.27-8.31 (t, 1H), 8.16 (d, 1H), 7.99-8.03 (dt, 2H), 7.73-7.76 (m, 1H), 7.59 (d, 2H), 7.41-7.45 (dt, 1H), 7.35-7.39 (dt, 1H), 7.30-7.34 (m, 2H), 7.27 (d, 1H), 2.90 (s, 3H, CH₃).

Ru(tpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)(NO₃)(PF₆).2H₂O

Ru(tpy)Cl₃ (500 mg, 1.13 mmol) and Mebim-pz⁺I⁻ (382 mg, 1.13 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 2 hours. The crude product was isolated by addition of aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate and washed with water and ether. The brown solid obtained was dissolved in acetone and aqueous potassium nitrate was added. The mixture was filtered to remove undissolved materials and the filtrate was allowed to stand for several days. The dark red crystals of Ru(tpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)(NO₃)(PF₆).2H₂O were isolated by filtration, washed with ice-cold water, ether and air-dried. Yield: 450 mg, 49%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₂₇H₂₇F₆N₈O₆PRu: C, 40.81 (40.25); N, 13.58 (13.91); H, 3.28 (3.38). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(tpy)(Mebim-pz)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 10.2 (d, 1H), 9.72 (s, 1H, pz) 8.80 (d, 1H), 8.49 (d, 2H), 8.6 (d, 2H), 8.19-8.23 (t, 2H), 7.90-7.94 (t, 2H), 7.54 (d, 2H), 7.34-7.43 (m, 2H), 7.21-7.24 (dd, 3H), 2.96 (s, 3H, CH₃).

Ru(tpy)(MeIm-py)(OH₂)(ClO₄)₂

Ru(tpy)Cl₃ (500 mg, 1.13 mmol) and MeIm-py⁺PF₆ ⁻ (345 mg, 1.13 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 2 hours. Aqueous sodium perchlorate was added and the mixture was filtered. The filtrate was allowed to stand for several hours and a black microcrystalline solid formed. It was isolated by filtration, washed with ice-cold water and air-dried. Yield: 520 mg, 65%. Anal Found (Calc.) for C₂₄H₂₂Cl₂N₆O₉Ru: C, 40.50 (40.57); N, 11.72 (11.83); H, 3.12 (3.13). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(tpy)(MeIm-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.36 (d, 1H), 8.49 (d, 2H) 8.39 (d, 2H), 8.26-8.30 (t, 1H), 8.21-8.25 (t, 1H), 8.00-8.06 (m, 3H), 7.90 (d, 1H), 7.70-7.74 (t, 1H), 7.60 (d, 2H), 7.34-7.37 (t, 2H), 6.85 (d, 1H), 2.71 (s, 3H, CH₃).

Ru(tpy)(acac)(OH₂)(PF₆)

This complex was prepared as reported in Adeyemi, S. A.; Dovletoglou, A.; Guadalupe, A. R.; Meyer, T. J., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31(8), 1375-1383.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(Cl)](Cl)

[((Mebimpy)(Cl)Ru)₂Cl₂] (300 mg, 0.29 mmol) and bpy (92 mg, 59 mmol) were suspended in 45 mL of 2:1 EtOH:H₂O and the mixture was degassed by argon bubbling. The suspension was heated at reflux for 4 hours and 10 mL of 20% aqueous LiCl were added. After an additional 20 min the mixture was filtered hot and the filtrate was allowed to cool overnight. The brown microcrystalline solid formed was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. Yield: 329 mg, 85%. ¹H-NMR (CD₃OD): δ 10.68 (d, 1H), 8.83 (d, 1H), 8.71 (d, 2H), 8.44-8.48 (td, 1H), 8.36 (d, 1H), 8.20-8.24 (t, 1H), 8.09-8.12 (td, 1H), 7.69 (d, 2H), 7.56-7.60 (td, 1H), 7.46 (d, 1H), 7.38-7.42 (t, 2H), 4.51 (s, 6H, 2CH₃). This compound was used without further purification.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OTf)](OTf).4H₂O

(OTf is the triflate anion). A mixture of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(Cl)](Cl) (267 mg, 0.40 mmol) and AgOTf (218 mg, 0.85 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) were stirred under argon at room temperature overnight. The silver chloride was removed by filtration using a bed of Celite and the filtrate was taken to dryness by rotary evaporation. Diethyl ether was added and the solid was filtered, washed with ether and air dried. Yield: 348 mg, 90%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₃H₃₃F₆N₇O₁₀RuS₂: C, 41.09 (40.99); N, 10.13 (10.14); H, 2.86 (3.44). ¹H-NMR (CD₃CN, 400 MHz, as [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(CD₃CN)](OTf)₂) δ 10.10 (d, 1H), 8.70 (d, 1H), 8.67 (d, 2H), 8.49 (td, 1H), 8.36 (t, 1H), 8.28 (d, 1H), 8.07-8.10 (m, 1H), 7.72 (td, 2H), 7.69 (d, 2H), 7.44-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.41 (d, 1H), 7.13-7.17 (m, 2H), 7.07-7.10 (m, 1H), 6.20 (d, 2H), 4.44 (s, 6H, 2CH₃).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)](OTf)₂

This complex was prepared in-situ dissolving [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OTf)](OTf) in water. UV-Vis (0.1 M HNO₃) λ_(max), nm (ε, M⁻¹cm⁻¹): 487 (12600), 358 (40460), 343 (34700), 315 (27150), 290 (46300), 253 (sh, 32000), 245 (34700). UV-Vis (0.01 M NaOH) λ_(max), nm (ε, M⁻¹cm⁻¹): 600 (sh, 3970), 518 (11620), 357 (39500), 342 (33050), 315 (24450), 292 (50500), 255 (sh, 26650), 241 (31770).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(Cl)](Cl)

[Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃] (700 mg, 1.28 mmol) and bpm (203 mg, 1.28 mmol) were suspended in 60 mL of 2:1 EtOH:H₂O and the mixture was degassed by argon bubbling. Triethylamine (2.5 mL) was added with a syringe and the suspension was heated at reflux for 4 hours. 20 mL of 20% aqueous LiCl were added and the brown microcrystalline solid formed was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. Yield: 728 mg, 85%. ¹H-NMR (CD₃CN): δ 10.89-10.91 (dd, 1H), 9.42-9.44 (dd, 1H), 8.58 (d, 3H), 8.13-8.18 (m, 2H), 7.70-7.72 (dd, 1H), 7.63 (d, 2H), 7.39-7.44 (td, 2H), 7.09-7.13 (t, 2H), 6.99-7.02 (t, 1H), 6.24 (d, 2H), 4.40 (s, 6H, 2CH₃). This compound was used without further purification.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(OTf)](OTf).5H₂O

(OTf is the triflate anion). A mixture of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(Cl)](Cl) (268 mg, 0.40 mmol) and AgOTf (218 mg, 0.85 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) were stirred under argon at room temperature overnight. The silver chloride was removed by filtration using a bed of Celite and the filtrate was taken to dryness by rotary evaporation. Diethyl ether was added and the solid was filtered, washed with ether and air dried. Yield: 359 mg, 91%. Anal Found (Calc.) for C₃₁H₂₃F₆N₉O₆RuS₂.5H₂O: C, 37.63 (37.73); N, 12.59 (12.77); H, 2.77 (3.37). ¹H-NMR (D₂O, 400 MHz, as [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(D₂O)](OTf)₂), δ 10.27 (dd, 1H); 9.42 (d, 1H); 8.64 (d, 2H); 8.45 (dd, 1H); 8.26 (t, 2H); 8.24 (d, 1H); 7.74 (dd, 1H); 7.61 (d, 2H); 7.37 (t, 2H); 7.06 (t, 2H); 6.99 (t, 1H); 6.23 (d, 2H); 4.40 (s, 6H, 2CH₃).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(OH₂)](OTf)₂

This complex was prepared in-situ dissolving [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(OTf)](OTf) in water. UV-Vis (0.1 M HNO₃) λ_(max), nm (ε, M⁻¹ cm⁻¹): 526 (sh, 4120), 439 (9070), 359 (34180), 345 (28140), 316 (21700), 245 (37640). UV-Vis (0.01 M NaOH) λ_(max), nm (ε, M⁻¹cm⁻¹): 572 (sh, 4840), 494 (8360), 358 (31400), 344 (25950), 315 (20350), 302 (18300), 262 (sh, 29650), 245 (33600).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(Cl)](Cl)

[Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃] (700 mg, 1.28 mmol) and bpz (203 mg, 1.28 mmol) were suspended in 25 mL of 4:1 ethyleneglycol: H₂O and the mixture was degassed by argon bubbling. Triethylamine (2.5 mL) was added with a syringe and the suspension was heated at 140° C. for 3 hours. 20 mL of 20% aqueous LiCl were added and the black microcrystalline solid formed was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. Yield: 745 mg, 87%. ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 10.62 (d, 1H), 10.23 (s, 1H), 9.75 (s, 1H), 9.27 (d, 1H), 8.81 (d, 2H), 8.35-8.39 (t, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H), 7.87 (d, 2H), 7.76 (d, 1H), 7.38-7.42 (t, 2H), 7.11-7.15 (t, 2H), 6.04 (d, 2H), 4.50 (s, 6H, 2CH₃). This compound was used without further purification.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(OTf)](OTf).4H₂O

(OTf is the triflate anion). A mixture of [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(Cl)](Cl) (268 mg, 0.40 mmol) and AgOTf (218 mg, 0.85 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) were stirred under argon at room temperature overnight. The silver chloride was removed by filtration using a bed of Celite and the filtrate was taken to dryness by rotary evaporation. Diethyl ether was added and the solid was filtered, washed with ether and air dried. Yield: 359 mg, 91%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₁H₃₁F₆N₉O₁₀RuS₂: C, 38.13 (38.43); N, 13.26 (13.01); H, 2.97 (3.23). ¹H-NMR (CD₃CN, 400 MHz, as [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(CD₃CN)](OTf)₂) δ 10.20 (d, 1H), 9.90 (s, 1H), 9.47 (s, 1H), 9.18 (d, 1H), 8.70 (d, 2H), 8.43-8.47 (t, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H), 7.68 (d, 2H), 7.59 (d, 1H), 7.43-7.47 (t, 2H), 7.14-7.18 (t, 2H), 6.18 (d, 2H), 4.42 (s, 6H, 2CH₃).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(OH₂)](OTf)₂

This complex was prepared in-situ dissolving [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpz)(OTf)](OTf) in water. UV-Vis (0.1 M HNO₃) λ_(max), nm (ε, M⁻¹cm⁻¹): 509 (6760), 428 (6450), 357 (27230), 343 (sh, 22880), 308 (32550).

Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)(OTF)₂.H₂O

Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ (618 mg, 1.13 mmol) and Mebim-py⁺I⁻ (382 mg, 1.13 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 3 hours. The crude product was isolated by addition of aqueous lithium triflate and washed with water and ether. The brown solid obtained was dissolved in 1:1 MeOH:H₂O, filtered to remove undissolved materials and the filtrate was loaded on a column (Sephadex LH-20) and eluted with 1:1 MeOH:H₂O. The yellow-orange band was collected and added to saturated aqueous lithium triflate. Upon standing in the refrigerator overnight Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)(OTf)₂.H₂O formed. The product was isolated by filtration, washed with ice-cold water and air-dried. Yield: 450 mg, 40%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₆H₃₂F₆N₈O₈RuS₂: C, 43.79 (43.95); N, 11.32 (11.39); H, 3.14 (3.28). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(Mebimpy)(Mebim-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.83-9.85 (dd, 1H), 8.58-8.62 (t, 3H), 8.49-8.53 (dt, 1H), 8.30-8.34 (t, 1H), 8.12 (d, 1H), 7.81-7.84 (dt, 1H), 7.67 (d, 2H), 7.40-7.43 (t, 2H), 7.33-7.37 (dt, 1H), 7.28-7.32 (t, 1H), 7.20 (d, 1H), 7.08-7.12 (t, 2H), 6.09 (d, 2H), 4.39 (s, 6H, 2CH₃, Mebimpy), 2.99 (s, 3H, CH₃, Mebim-py).

Ru(Mebimpy)(MeIm-py)(OH₂)(OTf)₂.2H₂O

Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ (618 mg, 1.13 mmol) and MeIm-py⁴PF₆ ⁻ (345 mg, 1.13 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 3 hours. The crude product was isolated by addition of aqueous lithium triflate and washed with water and ether. The brown solid obtained was dissolved in 1:1 MeOH:H₂O, filtered to remove undissolved materials and the filtrate was loaded on a column (Sephadex LH-20) and eluted with 1:1 MeOH:H₂O. The yellow-orange band was collected and added to saturated aqueous lithium triflate. Upon standing in the refrigerator overnight Ru(Mebimpy)(MeIm-py)(OH₂)(OTf)₂.2H₂O formed. The product was isolated by filtration, washed with ice-cold water and air-dried. Yield: 484 mg, 45%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₆H₃₂F₆N₈O₈RuS₂: C, 40.36 (40.38); N, 11.74 (11.77); H, 3.25 (3.39). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(Mebimpy)(MeIm-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.77 (d, 1H), 8.58 (d, 2H), 8.39-8.43 (t, 1H), 8.24-8.28 (t, 1H), 8.10 (d, 1H), 7.84 (d, 1H), 7.78-7.82 (t, 1H), 7.69 (d, 2H), 7.43-7.47 (t, 2H), 7.11-7.15 (t, 2H), 6.77 (d, 1H), 6.10 (d, 2H), 4.40 (s, 6H, 2CH₃, Mebimpy), 2.80 (s, 3H, CH₃, MeIm-py).

Ru(Mebimpy)(acac)(OH₂)(OTf).H₂O

Neat triflic acid (2.0 mL) was added to 300 mg (0.29 mmol) of [((Mebimpy)(Cl)Ru)₂Cl₂] and the mixture was stirred for 1 hour. Addition of ether causes precipitation of a red solid which was filtered and washed with ether. This solid is presumably Ru(Mebimpy)(OTf)₃ and was used in the next step without further characterization. The obtained Ru(Mebimpy)(OTf)₃, acetylacetone (71 mg, 0.645 mmol) and methanol (40 mL) were degassed by argon bubbling and triethylamine (2.0 mL) was added with a syringe. The mixture was heated at reflux for 3 hours and water was added, followed by 10% aqueous lithium triflate. The purple solid was filtered and washed with water and ether and dried under vacuum. Yield: 400 mg, 94%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₆H₃₂F₆N₈O₈RuS₂: C, 44.89 (44.75); N, 9.69 (9.66); H, 3.87 (3.89).

Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-(H₂O₃PCH₂)₂-bpy)(OH₂)(OTf)₂

Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ (618 mg, 1.13 mmol), 4,4′-((OEt)₂OPCH₂)₂-bpy (516 mg, 1.13 mmol) and LiCl (100 mg) were suspended in 45 mL of 2:1 EtOH:H₂O and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at reflux for 5 hours. 10% aqueous lithium chloride (20 mL) was added and the precipitate of Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-(OEt)₂OPCH₂)₂-bpy)(Cl)(Cl) was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. This solid was refluxed in 60 mL of 4.0 M aqueous HCl for 5 days to hydrolyze the phosphonate esther groups. After cooling to room temperature, the purple precipitate of Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-(H₂O₃PCH₂)₂-bpy)(Cl)(Cl) was isolated by filtration and washed with water and ether. To this solid, triflic acid (3.0 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. Hydroquinone (124 mg, 1.13 mmol) dissolved in 10 mL of water was added to reduce any Ru(III) species and after a few minutes aqueous lithium triflate was added to complete precipitation of the product. The maroon solid was isolated by filtration, washed with water, ether and air-dried. Yield: 896 mg, 72%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₃₅H₃₃F₆N₇O₁₃P₂RuS₂: C, 38.73 (38.19); N, 9.19 (8.91); H, 3.95 (3.02). ¹H NMR (CD₃OD): δ 9.83-9.91 (dd, 1H), 8.81 (d, 2H), 8.77 (d, 2H), 8.33-8.37 (t, 1H), 8.28-8.32 (t, 1H), 8.12-8.18 (dd, 1H), 7.70-7.74 (t, 2H), 7.42 (d, 1H), 7.39 (d, 1H), 7.11-7.20 (m, 2H), 6.92 (d, 1H), 6.31-6.35 (t, 2H), 4.56 (s, 6H, 2CH₃, Mebimpy), 3.66 (d, 2H, CH₂), 2.97 (d, 2H, CH₂)

Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)(PF₆)₂.1.5H₂O

This complex was prepared by a modification of a literature procedure for Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)(ClO₄)₂.2H₂O, which was described in Hull et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131 (25), 8730-8731. Ru(DMAP)Cl₃ (500 mg, 1.25 mmol), bpy (195 mg, 1.25 mmol) and zinc powder (1.00 g) were suspended in water (60 mL) and degassed by bubbling argon. The mixture was heated at reflux for 1 hour and filtered hot through a bed of Celite. The crude product was isolated by addition of aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate and washed with water and ether. The red solid obtained was dissolved in MeOH, filtered to remove undissolved materials and added to aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate. The MeOH was removed by rotary evaporation and the dark red needles of Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)(PF₆)₂.1.5H₂O formed were filtered and washed with cold water and ether. Yield: 589 mg, 60%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₂₁H₃₂F₁₂N₅O_(2.5)P₂Ru: C, 32.10 (32.11); N, 8.90 (8.92); H, 4.03 (4.11). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.49 (d, 1H), 8.55 (d, 1H), 8.51 (d, 1H), 8.10-8.14 (dt, 1H), 8.05-8.09 (dt, 1H), 7.98-8.02 (t, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H), 7.75-7.78 (dt, 1H), 7.64 (d, 2H), 7.47-7.51 (dt, 1H), 4.11 (d, 2H, H CH₂(1), H CH₂(2)), 3.92 (d, 2H, H CH₂(2), H CH₂(1)), 2.36 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(1), 3H CH₃(2)), 1.49 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(2), 3H CH₃(1)).

Ru(DMAP)(MeIm-py)(OH₂)(PF₆)₂.0.5H₂O

Ru(DMAP)Cl₃ (250 mg, 0.63 mmol) and MeIm-py⁺PF6⁻ (191 mg, 0.63 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 3 hours. The product was isolated by addition of aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate and washed with water and ether and air-dried. Yield: 290 mg, 60%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₂₀H₃₁F₁₂N₆O_(1.5)P₂Ru: C, 31.11 (31.18); N, 12.02 (10.91); H, 4.02 (4.06). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(DMAP)(MeIm-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.29 (d, 2H), 8.01 (d, 1H), 7.96 (d, 1H), 7.79-7.82 (t, 1H), 7.50-7.53 (t, 1H), 7.44 (d, 2H), 6.48 (s, 1H), 3.95 (d, 2H, H CH₂(1), H CH₂(2)), 3.89 (d, 2H, H CH₂(2), H CH₂(1)), 3.81 (s, 3H, CH₃, MeIm-py), 2.26 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(1), 3H CH₃(2)), 1.67 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(2), 3H CH₃(1)).

Ru(DMAP)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)(PF₆)₂.2H₂O

Ru(DMAP)Cl₃ (250 mg, 0.63 mmol) and Mebim-py⁺I⁻ (212 mg, 0.63 mmol) were suspended in ethyleneglycol and degassed by bubbling argon. Triethylamine (1.0 mL) was added with a syringe and the mixture was heated at 150° C. for 3 hours. The product was isolated by addition of aqueous ammonium hexafluorophosphate and washed with water and ether and air-dried. Yield: 281 mg, 55%. Anal. Found (Calc.) for C₂₄H₃₆F₁₂N₆O₃P₂Ru: C, 33.92 (34.01); N, 9.83 (9.92); H, 4.19 (4.28). ¹H NMR (CD₃CN, as Ru(DMAP)(MeIm-py)(CD₃CN)²⁺): δ 9.29 (d, 1H), 8.46 (d, 1H), 8.23-8.26 (m, 1H), 8.15-8.20 (dt, 1H), 7.97-8.00 (t, 1H), 7.62 (d, 2H), 7.50-7.58 (m, 4H), 4.22 (d, 2H, H CH₂(1), H CH₂(2)), 3.93 (d, 2H, H CH₂(2), H CH₂(1)), 334 (s, 3H, CH₃, Mebim-py), 2.36 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(1), 3H CH₃(2)), 1.77 (s, 6H, 3H CH₃(2), 3H CH₃(1)).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(N—N)(OTf)](OTf)

A mixture of [Ru(Mebimpy)-(N—N)(Cl)](Cl) (0.50 mmol) and AgOTf (1.05 mmol; OTf) triflate anion) in MeOH (40 mL) was stirred under argon at room temperature overnight. The silver chloride was removed by filtration using a bed of Celite, and the filtrate was taken to dryness by rotary evaporation. Diethyl ether was added, and the solid was filtered, washed with ether, and air-dried.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OTf)](OTf)

1H NMR (CD₃CN, 400 MHz, as [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(CD₃CN)](OTf)₂): δ 10.10 (d, 1H), 8.70 (d, 1H), 8.67 (d, 2H), 8.49 (td, 1H), 8.36 (t, 1H), 8.28 (d, 1H), 8.07-8.10 (m, 1H), 7.72 (td, 2H), 7.69 (d, 2H), 7.44-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.41 (d, 1H), 7.13-7.17 (m, 2H), 7.07-7.10 (m, 1H), 6.20 (d, 2H), 4.44 (s, 6H, 2CH3). Anal. Found (calcd) for C₃₃H₂₅F₆N₇O₆RuS₂.4H₂O: C, 41.09 (40.99); N, 10.13 (10.14); H, 2.86 (3.44). High-resolution MS (ESI, m/z): 746.0735 (M+).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpm)(OTf)](OTf)

1H NMR (D₂O, 400 MHz, as [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(D2O)](OTf)₂): δ 10.27 (dd, 1H), 9.42 (d, 1H), 8.64 (d, 2H), 8.45 (dd, 1H), 8.26 (t, 2H), 8.24 (d, 1H), 7.74 (dd, 1H), 7.61 (d, 2H), 7.37 (t, 2H), 7.06 (t, 2H), 6.99 (t, 1H), 6.23 (d, 2H), 4.40 (s, 6H, 2CH3). Anal. Found (calcd) for C₃₁H₂₃F₆N₉O₆RuS₂.5H₂O: C, 37.63 (37.73); N, 12.59 (12.77); H, 2.77 (3.37). High-resolution MS (ESI, m/z): 748.0640 (M+).

[Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)](PF6)₂

1H NMR (D₂O, 400 MHz, as [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(D₂O)](PF₆)₂): δ 9.83 (d, 1H), 9.25 (d, 1H), 8.60 (dd, 1H), 8.52 (d, 2H), 8.38 (d, 2H), 8.19 (t, 1H), 8.15 (t, 1H), 7.91 (t, 2H), 7.77 (d, 2H), 7.73 (dd, 1H), 7.27 (t, 2H), 7.08 (t, 1H). Anal. Found (calcd) for C₂₃H₁₉F₁₂N₇OP₂Ru.H₂O: C, 33.72 (33.75); N, 12.09 (11.98); H, 2.54 (2.59).

[Ru(Mebimpy)(N—N)(OH₂)](OTf)₂

The aquo complexes were generated in situ by dissolving the triflate complexes in water.

[Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)](OTf)₂

UV-vis λmax, nm (ε, M⁻¹ cm⁻¹): in 0.1 M HNO₃, 487 (12600), 358 (40460), 343 (34700), 315 (27150), 290 (46300), 253 (sh, 32000), 245 (34700); in 0.01 M NaOH, 600 (sh, 3970), 518 (11620), 357 (39500), 342 (33050), 315 (24450), 292 (50500), 255 (sh, 26650), 241 (31770).

[Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH2)](PF6)2

UV-vis λmax, nm (ε, M⁻¹ cm⁻¹): in 0.1 M HNO₃, 483 (7350), 428 (sh, 6220), 365 (7050), 332 (sh, 14720), 309 (29900), 270 (sh, 26500), 262 (27900), 240 (30900), 231 (sh, 29800); in 0.01 M NaOH, 521 (7390), 477 (sh, 6660), 384 (8130), 316 (27600), 274 (23300), 263 (sh, 25800), 237 (34900).

Example 1

Reaction of [Ru(tpy)(C₂O₄)(OH₂)] with bpz or bpm in 0.1 M HClO₄ or of [Ru(tpy)(L)(Cl)]⁺ (L is bpm or bpz) with AgNO₃ in 1:1 H₂O/MeOH yields the corresponding aqua complexes [Ru-(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺ and [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺.

[Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺ and [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺ may be prepared according to methods discussed in the Concepcion et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130 (49), 16462-16463.

Example 2

The preparation of 1 [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ (Mebimpy is 2,6-bis(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine) and [Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ (1-PO₃H₂) is illustrated below. Ru(Mebimpy)Cl₃ is allowed to react with bpy or 4,4′-((EtO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy in 2:1 EtOH:H₂O in the presence of NEt₃ giving [Ru(Mebimpy)(L)(Cl)]⁺ (L is bpy or 4,4′-((EtO)₂OPCH₂bpy). The chloride ligand was subsequently displaced by the more labile triflate anion in neat triflic acid. Upon addition of water, rapid aquation occurs and the resulting aqua complex was isolated as the triflate salt by addition of excess lithium triflate. For the phosphonate ester precursor of 1-PO₃H₂, L=4,4′-((EtO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy, the ester groups were hydrolyzed by heating the complex in 4.0 M aqueous HCl at 100° C. for 4 days prior to replacement of the chloride ligand.

Example 3

As shown in FIG. 1, the bpm complex shares with [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ multiple, pH-dependent oxidations in aqueous solutions. For [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, pH dependent Ru^(III)/Ru^(II) and Ru^(IV)/Ru^(III) couples appear separated by 92 mV over a broad pH range characteristic of closely spaced Ru(III/II) and Ru(IV/III) couples. The small potential separation between couples is a consequence of “redox potential leveling” and the PCET nature of the couple. Protons are lost with no build up of charge between couples, and higher oxidation state Ru(IV) is stabilized by RudO bond formation. There is no evidence for further oxidation of this complex to the solvent limit at ˜1.8 V, and this complex is not a catalyst for water oxidation.

For [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺, Ru^(III) is a “missing” oxidation state. A single 2e⁻ Ru^(IV)/Ru^(II) wave, as shown by peak current comparisons with the [Ru(bpy)³]^(3+/2+) couple, is observed from pH 0 to pH=14 with a change from the [Ru^(IV)═O]²⁺+2e− +2H⁺→[Ru^(II)—OH₂]²⁺ couple to [Ru^(IV)═O]²⁺+2e⁻+H⁺→[Ru^(II)—OH]⁺, past pK_(a,1)=9.7. E_(1/2) for the Ru^(IV)/Ru^(III) couple is lower than E_(1/2) for the Ru^(III)/Ru^(II) couple owing to bpm stabilization of Ru(II) by backbonding and stabilization of Ru(IV) (and Ru(V), see FIG. 1) by σ donation.

As shown in FIG. 1, at higher potentials a pH-independent, 1e⁻ wave appears in the cyclic voltammogram at 1.65 V as a shoulder on the onset of a catalytic wave for water oxidation. The electrochemistry for [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺ is similar to that for [Ru(tpy)(bpm)-(OH₂)]²⁺ with redox potentials for the corresponding Ru(IV/II) and Ru(V/IV) couples shifted to higher potentials.

Example 4

The crystal structure of trans-[Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺ cation is shown in FIG. 5. Only one of the two possible isomers, the trans isomer, is obtained. Notable features in the structure are the relatively short Ru—C distance (1.943 {acute over (Å)}) indicative of multiple Ru—C bonding and the longer Ru—O distance (2.183 {acute over (Å)}) compared to Ru(tpy)(bpy)(OH₂)²⁺ (2.146 {acute over (Å)}) and Ru(tpy)(phendione)(OH₂)²⁺ (2.127 {acute over (Å)}, phendione is 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione). (See Qvortrup et al., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online, 2007, E63(5), m1400-m1401 and Fujihara, et al., Dalton Trans. 2004, 4, 645-652). This labializing effect might play an important role in the oxygen evolution step in the water oxidation catalytic cycle.

Example 5

Representative cyclic voltammograms for the series [Ru-(Mebimpy)(LL)(OH₂)]²⁺ (LL=bpy, bpm, bpz) and for Ru(DMAP)(bpy)(OH₂)²⁺ and trans-[Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)-(OH2)]²⁺ in 0.1 M HNO₃ and for Ru(tpy)(acac)(OH₂)]⁺ are shown in FIGS. 6( a) and 6(b) respectively.

In these cyclic voltammograms, E^(o′) values for the [Ru^(III)(Mebimpy)(LL)(OH/OH₂)]^(2+/3+)/[Ru^(II)(Mebimpy)(LL)-(OH₂)]²⁺ and [Ru^(IV)(Mebimpy)(LL)(O)]²⁺/[Ru^(III)(Mebimpy)-(LL)(OH/OH₂)]^(2+/3+) couples vary systematically through the series from 0.82 to 1.13V for the Ru^(III/II) couple and from 1.24 to 1.48 V for the Ru^(IV/III) couple. E^(o′) values for the Ru^(III/II) and Ru^(IV/III) couples vary from 0.51 to 1.18 V and from 0.74 to 1.54 V, respectively, in the entire series (Tables 1 and 2).

Variations in E^(o′) are a consequence of the influence of σ-donor ligands in stabilizing higher oxidation states and π-acceptor ligands in stabilizing Ru^(II), Ligand variations also influence the pK_(a)'s of Ru^(III)OH₂ ³⁺ and Ru^(II)OH₂ ²⁺, which, in turn, affect the redox potentials due to the Ph dependence of the Ru^(III/II) and Ru^(IV/III) couples. An additional Ru^(V/IV), ligand-dependent wave appears as a shoulder from ˜1.40 to ˜1.72 V at the onset of a catalytic water oxidation wave. Electrocatalytic water oxidation waves well above the background appear for all complexes past 1.3 V.

TABLE 1 Water Oxidation Rate Constants and E_(1/2) (V vs NHE) Values for the Ru^(III/II), Ru^(IV/III), and Ru^(V/IV) Couples in the Series [Ru(tpy)(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+)in 0.1M HNO₃ ^(a) k_(O—O) or k₂ or k₅ LL R^(III/II) Ru^(IV/III) Ru^(V/IV) k₄ (s⁻¹) (M⁻¹ s⁻¹) t_(1/2) (s⁻¹) bpy 1.01 1.19 1.60 1.9 × 10⁻⁴ 3650 bpm 1.12 <1.12 1.65 7.5 × 10⁻⁴ 925 bpz 1.22 <1.22 1.69 1.4 × 10⁻³ 495 Mebim-py 1.11 1.49 1.70 33 410 Mebim-pz 1.18 1.54 1.72 170 80 acae 0.51 1.14 1.58 5.0 × 10⁻⁴ 515 1390.26 ^(a)Half-times (t_(1/2)) for net Ce^(IV) consumption with [Ce^(IV)] = 1.5 × 10⁻³M and [RuOH₂]²⁺ - 5.1 × 10⁻⁵M at 23 ± 2° C. Only 2e⁻Ru^(IV)═O²⁺/Ru^(II)OH₂ ²⁺ couples are observed for [Ru(tpy)(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+)(LL = bpm, bpz).

TABLE 2 As in Table 1 for the Series[Ru(LLL)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ k₄ k₂ or k₅ LLL Ru^(III/II) Ru^(IV/III) Ru^(V/IV) (s⁻¹) M⁻¹ s⁻¹ t_(1/2) (s⁻¹) tpy 1.01 1.19 1.60 1.9 × 10⁻⁴ 3650 Mebimpy 0.82 1.29 1.67 52 260 DMAP 0.54 0.88 1.40 4.1 3315

Example 6

Some complexes were screened as catalysts for net water oxidation by Ce^(IV), 2H₂O+4Ce⁴⁺→O₂+4H⁺+4Ce³⁺, by adding 30 equivalents of Ce^(IV) to 5.1×10⁻⁵ M complex in 0.1 M HNO₃. In these experiments loss of Ce^(IV) was monitored spectrophotometically at 360 nm, on the shoulder of λ_(max) 318 nm for Ce^(IV), ε=3070 M⁻¹cm⁻¹. In all cases complete Ce^(IV) consumption was observed on time scales from <100 s to 20000 s.

For the series [Ru(tpy)(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+) (Table 1; LL=bidentate ligand) and [Ru(LLL)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ (Table 2; LLL=tpy, Mebimpy, or DMAP) in 0.1 M HNO₃, absorbance-time measurements with Ce^(IV) in pseudo-first-order excess revealed two types of behavior. In one, the rate law was first-order in complex, added initially as Ru^(II)(OH₂)^(n+), and zero-order in Ce⁴⁺. The initial oxidation to Ru^(IV)═O^(n+) is rapid. According to the mechanism described in the application, this behavior is consistent with either rate-limiting Ru^(IV)═O^(n+) oxo attack on H₂O, k_(O—O), or rate-limiting O₂ loss from Ru^(IV)(OO)^(n+), k₄. The latter is rate-limiting for [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺- and [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH₂)]²⁺-catalyzed water oxidation. In the second type of behavior, the rate law was first-order in [Ru^(II)(OH₂)²⁺] and first-order in Ce⁴⁺. This limit is consistent with either rate-limiting oxidation of Ru^(IV)═O^(n+) to Ru^(V)═O^((n+1)+), k2 in the mechanism proposed in the application, or rate-limiting oxidation of Ru^(IV)(OO)^(n+), k5. [Ru(tpy)(acac)(OH₂)]⁺ is different. Both first- and zero-order pathways in CeIV compete in 0.1 M HNO₃, with the first-order pathway dominating early in the catalytic cycle and the zero-order pathway dominating as Ce^(IV) is depleted.

Tables 1 and 2 present E_(1/2) values for Ru^(III/II), Ru^(IV/III), and Ru^(V/IV) couples as well as rate constants for the rate-limiting steps in water oxidation catalysis by the series [Ru(tpy)-(LL)(OH₂)]^(n+) and [Ru(LLL)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺. For comparisons among catalysts having different rate-limiting steps, the half times t_(1/2) for consumption of Ce^(IV), with Ce^(IV)=1.5×10⁻³ M initially and [Ru(OH₂)]^(n+)=5.1×10⁻⁵, are also reported.

General trends emerge from the data in Tables 1 and 2. For the Ru^(V/III) couples, of relevance in the O—O bond-forming step (k_(O—O) in the proposed mechanism), E_(1/2)(Ru^(V/III))=½[(E_(1/2)(Ru^(V/IV))+E_(1/2) (R^(IV/III))], is dictated largely by the Ru^(IV/III) couple. It is highly tunable ranging from 1.54 to 0.88 V because of its sensitivity to the σ-donor and π-acceptor properties of the ligands. The Ru^(V/III) couple is pH-dependent. E^(o′) decreases by −118 mV/pH unit in strongly acidic solutions where the Ru^(V)═O^(n+/)/Ru^(III)OH₂ ²⁺ couple and by −59 mV/pH unit for the Ru^(V)═O^(n+)/Ru^(III)OH^((n−1)+) couple dominates past the pK_(a) for Ru^(III)OH₂ ^(n+), which is also ligand-dependent.

For representative complexes [Ru(tpy)(bpm)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mebim-py)(OH₂)]²⁺, [Ru(tpy)(Mebim-pz)(OH₂)]²⁺, and [Ru(Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺, oxygen evolution was measured by use of an O₂ electrode. In all cases, the expected amount of oxygen, 7.5 equiv/30 equiv of Ce^(IV), was observed, showing that water oxidation is quantitative.

Example 7

Stable phosphonate surface binding of 1-PO₃H₂ ([Ru(Mebimpy)(4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺) on FTO (fluorine-doped SnO₂) or ITO (Sn(IV)-doped In₂O₃) and in optically transparent films (˜10 μm thickness) of nanoparticle TiO₂ (10-20 nm diameter) on FTO (FTO|TiO₂) occurred following exposure of the electrodes to a 0.1 mM stock solution of 1-PO₃H₂ in methanol.

The schematic representation of {Ru(Mebimpy)[4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy](OH₂)}²⁺ (1-PO₃H₂) attached on a metal oxide B was show below:

Saturation coverage of 1.2×10⁻¹⁰ mol/cm² on FTO and ITO was achieved in ˜2 h as monitored by the area under the cyclic voltammetric wave for the Ru(III/II) couple at E_(1/2)=0.67 V vs NHE in pH 5 (CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na buffer, I=0.1 M), Figure S1. The extent of surface loading on FTO|TiO₂ in mol/cm² was calculated from UV-visible measurements by using Γ=A(λ)/(10³×ε(λ)), with A(λ) and ε(λ) the absorbance and molar absorptivities at λ. (See Trammell et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103(1), 104-107.) For surface-bound Ru^(II)—OH₂ ²⁺, λ_(max)=493 nm and ε_(max)=1.5×10⁴ M⁻¹cm⁻¹ for 1-PO₃H₂ in methanol was used for ε(λ). Typical saturated surface coverage after 4 h exposure times were 5.3×10⁻⁸ mol/cm² for FTO|TiO₂ (See FIGS. 7( a) and (b)). In addition, the schematic representation of 1-PO₃H₂ attached to a metal oxide electrode is shown in FIG. 20.

Example 8

In FIG. 15 a a cyclic voltammogram (CV) of FTO|1-PO₃H₂ at pH=5 (CH₃CO₂H/CH₃CO₂Na buffer, I=0.1 M) is shown. As for solution couples in FIGS. 8 and 9, pH dependent waves appear for sequential Ru(III/II) and Ru(IV/III) couples on the surface at ˜0.67 and 0.98 V. Peak currents vary with scan rate as expected for surface couples. A pH independent Ru(V/IV) wave appears at ˜1.67 V on the onset of a catalytic water oxidation wave. Closely related results were obtained for ITO|1-PO₃H₂, FIG. 10. As observed earlier for a related surface couple, the Ru^(IV)=0²⁺/Ru^(III)—OH²⁺ wave is kinetically inhibited on the surface due to the proton demands of the couple.⁹ It is more distinct at slow scan rates or at high pH, FIG. 9. E_(1/2)-pH plots for solution and surface couples are shown in FIGS. 11 and 12.

The catalytic peak current at 1.85 V varies linearly with surface coverage, FIG. 13, consistent with a single site mechanism for water oxidation. When normalized for scan rate, the catalytic peak current increases with decreasing scan rate consistent with a rate limiting step prior to electron transfer to the electrode, FIG. 14.

Stepping the applied potential to E_(p,a)=1.85 V at pH=5, results in sustained electrocatalytic water oxidation, FIG. 15 b, with a current density of ˜14.8 μA/cm². Catalysis was sustained for at least 8 h corresponding to ˜11,000 turnovers at a turnover rate of ˜0.36 s⁻¹. Sustained catalytic currents were also obtained at pH 1 (0.1 M HNO₃) with a current density of ˜4.9 μA/cm², FIG. 16.

Example 9

The catalyst was also investigated on FTO|TiO₂. The same pattern of voltammetric waves was observed, FIG. 17. In cyclic voltammograms the peak current for the Ru(III/II) couple varied linearly with the square root of the scan rate, FIG. 18. This is consistent with an earlier observation for a surface-bound Os^(II) complex⁸ and electron transfer to and from the surface couple by cross-surface electron transfer. Based on peak current measurements, ˜2.5% of the available sites were electroactive at a scan rate of 100 mV/s and ˜8.0% at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Complete oxidation occurs on longer time scales. As shown in FIG. 3, the spectrum of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ as Ru^(II)—OH₂ is dominated by a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption band at 493 nm. A potential hold experiment at 0.75 V at pH 5, past E_(1/2) for the Ru^(III)—OH²⁺/Ru¹¹—OH₂ ²⁺ couple, results in spectral changes consistent with oxidation of Ru^(II)—OH₂ ²⁺ to Ru^(III)—OH²⁺ and, at 1.20 V, to oxidation of Ru^(III)—OH²⁺ to Ru^(IV)═O²⁺. A further increase in potential to 1.85 V results in spectral features for an intermediate similar to Ru^(IV)═O²⁺, Ru^(IV)(OO)²⁺, see below and note Scheme 1. Reduction of Ru^(III)—OH²⁺, Ru^(IV)═O²⁺, or Ru^(IV)(OO)²⁺ past E_(p,c) for the Ru^(III)—OH₂ ²⁺ couple results in complete recovery of Ru^(II)—OH₂ ²⁺.

The complex retains its electrocatalytic activity toward water oxidation on FTO|TiO₂. Electrolysis of FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ at 1.85 V at pH 5 resulted in sustained electrocatalysis, FIG. 19. Water oxidation is slow on FTO|TiO₂|1-PO₃H₂ with a turnover rate of 0.004 s⁻¹ due to rate limiting cross-surface electron transfer. Comparison of the integrated current over a period of 30,000 s with measurement of oxygen evolution by an oxygen electrode (YSI ProODO™) gave 6.5 μmol of O₂ corresponding to an oxygen yield of 77%. Given the difficulties in the experiment, this represents a lower limit in the oxygen yield.

Example 10

The impact of the addition of proton bases such as H₂PO₄, acetate (OAc⁻), or HPO₄ ^(2 on) the catalytic currents (e.g., i_(cat) (the catalytic current in mA/cm²)) for water oxidation catalyzed by [Ru (Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ has also been studies. As shown in FIG. 22, the upper, i_(cat) for [Ru (Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ increases with increasing base concentration. This is a base effect and not a pH effect. Variations in the HOAc/OAc⁻ buffer ratio and pH from 4 to 5.75 at fixed [OAc⁻] (0.064 M) had no effect on i_(cat).

The data in FIG. 22 and the rate constants in Table 3 illustrate that significant rate enhancements occur for the base catalyzed pathways. For example, i_(cat) reaches 9.1 mA/cm² in a solution 0.1 Min in HPO₄ ²⁻ (pH 7.45) at 100 mV/s compared to 0.24 mA/cm² in 0.1 M HNO3. The addition of even higher concentrations of OAc⁻ or HPO₄ ²⁻ resulted in no further current enhancements. Evidence for anation is found in a shift in the intense metal-to-ligand charge transfer absorption band for [Ru^(II) (Mebimpy)(bpy)(OH₂)]²⁺ from 486 nm in 0.01-0.1 M OAc⁻ to 490 nm in 1 M OAc⁻. Catalysis is lost with anation since Ru^(V)═O³⁺ is no longer accessible by oxidation and proton loss from Ru^(II)—OH₂ ²⁺.

The related phosphonate derivative {Ru(Mebimpy)[4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy](OH₂)}²⁺ was shown to function as a water oxidation catalyst when surface bound to Sn(IV)-doped In₂O₃ (ITO) or fluorine doped SnO₂ (FTO) electrodes, or in nanoparticle TiO₂ films on FTO (FTO|TiO₂). Surface binding of the catalyst is important in accelerating rates and in minimizing the amount of catalyst used in an electrocatalytic or photoelectrocatalytic application. As shown by the data in FIG. 23, significant current enhancements with added bases are also observed for 1-PO₃H₂ on ITO (ITO|1-PO₃H₂).

The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. Therefore, it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments, as well as other embodiments, are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein. 

1. A complex having the structure of formula (I):

wherein M is ruthenium (Ru) or osmium (Os), L₁ is a bidentate ligand, L₂ is a tridentate ligand, and L₃ is a monodentate ligand, n is 2 or
 1. 2. (canceled)
 3. The complex of claim 1, wherein L₂ is a tridentate ligand selected from the group consisting of

4-6. (canceled)
 7. A catalyst comprising a complex according to formula (I):

wherein M is ruthenium (Ru) or osmium (Os), L₁ is a bidentate ligand, L₂ is a tridentate ligand, and L₃ is a monodentate ligand, n is 2 or
 1. 8-11. (canceled)
 12. A photo-electrochemical cell comprising a catalyst comprising a complex according to formula (I):

wherein M is ruthenium (Ru) or osmium (Os), L₁ is a bidentate ligand, L₂ is a tridentate ligand, and L₃ is a monodentate ligand, n is 2 or
 1. 13-21. (canceled)
 22. The photo-electrochemical cell of claim 12, wherein, in the complex according to formula (I), L₁ is a bidentate ligand selected from the group consisting of


23. The photo-electrochemical cell of claim 12, wherein L₃ is OH₂.
 24. The photo-electrochemical cell of claim 12, wherein the complex according to formula (I) comprises the structure {Ru(Mebimpy)[4,4′-((HO)₂OPCH₂)₂bpy](OH₂)}²⁺.
 25. The photo-electrochemical cell of claim 12, wherein the complex according to formula (I) comprises a complex of Formula A or B:

wherein, for Formula A and B, the ligand

is independently selected from the group consisting of 